Professor of teeth Hitler is an angel of Russian history. Andrey Zubov: It has already happened. He compares Russia's actions in the case of the return of Crimea with the capture of European states by the Nazis, threatening her with defeat and death, recalling the defeat of Germany

The third number in the PARNAS electoral list Andrey Zubov- personality is remarkable in all respects. Starting with the fact that he considers Hitler "the angel of Russian history" (literal quotation), and ending with the fact that his liberalism has surpassed the limits of such a liberal university as MGIMO - Andrei Borisovich even managed to fly out of there. And it's clear why. Professor Zubov does not hesitate to express Vlasov's views and convince that the Soviet Union would be better off losing in the Great Patriotic War. Feeling wild hatred for Stalin, he, in a false opposition to Hitler, justifies National Socialism and all Hitler's accomplices who were convicted by the Nuremberg Tribunal. He speaks very warmly of the Baltic SS men, of the Ukrainian Bandera men. In a word, for him, May 9 really is a "day of memory and sorrow" - only not for the fallen Soviet people, but for a lost dream, where the Nazis and their accomplices win.

The revelations of "daddy's storyteller Mueller"

A conversation about Professor Andrei Zubov should generally begin with the fact that he is a typical person. Neo-fascism is rearing its head not only in some of the former Soviet republics, but also in Europe. They try to downplay the horrors of Hitlerism and the scale of the crimes committed by that government, simultaneously underestimating the degree of their complicity in them - after all, all of Europe either surrendered to the Third Reich, or allied with it openly and ideologically, and now they are ashamed to remember this, they do not want to. And they are trying to downplay the role of the Soviet Union in the victory over this monster, and in general to appoint the Soviet Union itself to the role of the monster. If you remember everything, it turns out that a fair amount of the atrocities of the fascist regime in the occupied territories were committed by the occupied citizens themselves, and not at all from the SS, but of their own free will and with enthusiasm.

All this was foreseen long ago, many decades ago. Some foresaw that their time would come when it would be possible to start rewriting history, and people would accept it, while others foresaw these plans and half a century ago we were warned of this danger.

Through the mouth of Müller, chief of the Gestapo in the novel Juliana Semyonova"Seventeen Moments of Spring" already then this plan was announced:

“The gold of the party is a bridge to the future, it is an appeal to our children, to those who are now a month, a year, three years old ... Those who are now ten do not need us: neither we, nor our ideas; they will not forgive us hunger and bombing. But those who now do not understand anything yet will tell legends about us, and the legend needs to be fed. We need to create storytellers who will transform our words in a different way, accessible to people in twenty years. As soon as somewhere instead of the word "hello" they say "heil!" to someone's personal address - you know, they are waiting for us there, from there we will begin our great rebirth! "

Andrey Zubov is just one of those "Storytellers who will translate the words of the Nazis in a different way, accessible to people in seventy years"... And he is not alone, there are many of them.

But let's listen to what Zubov says in his interview with Radio Liberty:

Back in the "Coffee Maker" of our institute, I told my friends how annoying it was that Stalin did not lose the war to Hitler. Because all the same, in the end, the allies would have liberated us, but then the British and Americans would have established democracy in our country and replaced the cannibalistic Stalinist regime. Hitler is the angel of Russian history.

Andrey Zubov

We are all more or less aware of how the allies planned to "liberate" us - fortunately, the documents on the "Unthinkable" plan, in which it was assumed that the allies, together with the captured Nazis, would again attack the Soviet Union weakened by the war, and by common efforts will finish it off completely - all this has already been declassified today. As well as Churchill's hysterical telegram, in which he begs Truman to subject the USSR to atomic bombing.

But the most interesting thing is the justification of murderers, war criminals and executioners by the fact that someone (allegedly) committed even more terrible crimes. This is absolutely Vlasov's position, because Vlasov also fought against Hitler at first, but then he considered that Hitler was "a lesser evil" than Stalin, and began to kill his people, to fight against his country on the side of Hitler.

The evolution of the intellectual, or "and here they knocked from below"

Characteristic is the gradual evolution of the views of Zubov, who in 2011 still criticized Vlasov for his betrayal, but radically changed his attitude to the Vlasov problem, and in general to the characterization of the war as Patriotic, about which he even wrote a whole textbook “History of Russia. XX century ", from which at the time of publication even distanced himself Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who at first accepted the idea of creating such a project with great enthusiasm.

However, Zubov and his co-authors in the book agreed to the point that even Solzhenitsyn - not the most, to put it mildly, a big fan of Stalin - decided that this was too much for him and refused to co-author and demanded that the data on his participation be deleted.

The typical method used by Zubov, whitewashing the fascists and justifying them and their accomplices, is to ascribe big crimes to someone else. Although it is not clear how one atrocity can be justified by another. Here is a typical example from the professor's speeches:

"Bandera" were called fascists, although, of course, this was not true. It was a typical nationalist organization of the war period with its own army, with its own terrorist wing. Then many acted in this way. Of course, some leaders of the Ukrainian national movement were carried away by the idea of Mussolini's corporatism. But Mussolini still called Joseph Stalin his best student. I think that Stalin was a greater fascist than Bandera and even Mussolini.

Andrey Zubov

That is, according to his logic, the Banderaites are not fascists because Stalin was allegedly a greater fascist than Bandera. Or here's another:

Everything was attributed to the Banderaites: the genocide of the Ukrainian people, and the extermination of Jews, and cooperation with Hitler and all imaginable atrocities. The Banderaites are an example of the great lie of the Soviet system. Although from the point of view of the science of history, it was a national liberation movement, anti-communist.

Andrey Zubov

A very interesting approach, especially considering that the genocide carried out by the Banderaites was not only documented, but also officially recognized by European states - for example, Poland, which recently condemned the Volyn massacre as a genocide of the Polish people.

But Zubov finds a justification for the crimes of Stepan Bandera's supporters:

Bandera was a hundred times less cruel than the Beria or Abakumov NKVD, which fought against the Bandera. Therefore, any attempt to free them from this state was already an element of justice. And in this sense, the Bandera movement is more morally justified than the Stalinist Soviet state.

Andrey Zubov

How the atrocities of the Bandera people against civilians and, in general, all the war crimes committed by them independently and jointly with the Nazi troops are connected with the post-war attempts by law enforcement agencies to bring them to justice for these atrocities is completely incomprehensible. Zubov deliberately makes a "mess" to compare the incomparable.

In reality, the Banderaites were recognized war criminals who knew exactly what they had done and tried to avoid responsibility. That is, Zubov does not consider real fascists and their accomplices to be fascists. And who does he consider to be fascists? You will laugh, but ... us!

Now we have no return to the USSR. All property is owned not by the state, but by a dozen people. All who cooperate with the authorities receive their share of the property. By all economic parameters, our regime is not socialist. It is much more reminiscent of the regime of the fascist state, where private corporations were created under state control. It is no accident that the fascist state was called corporate. This corporate capitalism is now being built in Russia.

Andrey Zubov

Thus, according to Zubov, the fascists are not fascists, but Russia, which defeated the fascists, is a fascist state. In exactly the same way, Zubov justifies the parades of SS veterans. Recall that according to the decision of the Nuremberg Tribunal, the SS was recognized wholly a criminal organization. That is, no part of the SS, no unit can be considered legal and not involved in war crimes - the tribunal condemned the entire organization wholly, and specifically mentioned this fact in a separate paragraph - that no exceptions can be made for anyone.

In fact, the whole of Europe knows that the parades of SS veterans are a direct violation of the verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal, but everyone turns a blind eye - these are the new members of the EU and NATO, how can you criticize them! Zubov does not criticize them either, although he writes history textbooks.

In a word, in the list of the PARNAS party under the honorable third number is not just a Russophobe, but a person with frankly Vlasov views, who justifies the crimes of the Nazis and their accomplices on the territory of our country and justifies the neo-fascists of our time. As they say, when he thought that he had already reached the very bottom, they knocked from below.

Now he travels around the cities of Russia and speaks at rallies with Kasyanov, trying to run for the State Duma. I suppose there is no need to explain to anyone what the appearance of such a deputy in Russian politics will mean.

Friends. We are on the doorstep. We are on the verge of not including a new subject in the Russian Federation. We are on the verge of complete destruction of the system of international treaties, economic chaos and political dictatorship. We are on the verge of a war with our closest, most related people of Ukraine, a sharp deterioration in relations with Europe and America, on the verge of a cold, and possibly a hot war with them.

After all, all this has already happened. Austria. Early March 1938 The Nazis wish to round off their Reich at the expense of another German state. The people are not very eager for this - no one infringes upon them, no one discriminates against them. But the idea of a great Germany turns the head of the radicals - the local Nazis. To put an end to the dispute over the fate of Austria, its chancellor Kurt Alois von Schuschnigg announces a plebiscite on March 13. But the Nazis in Berlin and Vienna are not happy with this. What if the people speak out against the Anschluss? Chancellor Schuschnigg is forced to resign on March 10, the president appoints the leader of the local Nazis, Arthur Seyss-Inquart, in his place, while German divisions are already entering Austrian cities at the invitation of the new chancellor, whom he himself learned from the newspapers. Austrian troops surrender. The people either greeted the Nazis with enthusiasm, or sat in their homes in irritation, or urgently flees to Switzerland. Austria's Cardinal Innitzer welcomes and blesses the Anschluss ... Arrests began on 13 March. Chancellor Schuschnigg was arrested the day before. The plebiscite was held on April 10. In Germany, 99.08% voted for unification with Austria, in Austria itself, which became the Ostmark of the German Empire - 99.75%. On October 1, 1938, the Czech Sudetenland were also reunited with the consanguineous Germany, on March 22, 1939 - the Lithuanian region of Klaipeda, which in one day turned into the German Memel. In all these lands, most of the Germans really lived, everywhere many of them really wanted to unite with the Hitlerite Reich. Everywhere this reunion took place with fanfare and shouts of exultation from the crowd, distraught in a chauvinistic frenzy and with the connivance of the West.

“We must not deceive, let alone hope to give hope to small weak states by promising them protection from the League of Nations and appropriate steps from our side,” Neville Chamberlain said in the British Parliament on February 22, 1938, “since we know that nothing this cannot be done. "

And Adolf Hitler spoke quite differently on March 23, 1939, from the balcony on Teatralnaya Square, which had just been joined by Memel. Two hours earlier, he theatrically sailed aboard the newest battleship "Germany" in the Memel port. “... The Germans are not going to do anything bad to anyone in the world, but it was necessary to end the suffering that the Germans suffered from the whole world for 20 years ... Germany once abandoned the Memel Germans to their fate, when it resigned itself to shame and dishonor ... Today the Memel Germans ... are again becoming citizens of the mighty Reich, determined to take their fate into their own hands, even if half of the world does not like it. "

And everything seemed so radiant. And the glory of Hitler shone at its zenith. And the world was in awe of Great Germany. The accession of regions and countries to the Reich without a single shot, without a single drop of blood - isn't the Fuhrer a genius politician?

And six years later Germany was defeated, millions of her sons were killed, millions of her daughters were dishonored, her cities were wiped off the face of the earth, her cultural values, accumulated for centuries, turned to dust. 2/5 of the territory was torn away from Germany, and the rest was divided into zones and occupied by the victorious powers. And shame, shame, shame covered the heads of the Germans. And it all started so radiantly!

Friends! History repeats itself. Russians do live in Crimea. But did anyone oppress them there, were they second-class people there, without the right to language, to the Orthodox faith? From whom should the soldiers of the Russian army protect them? Who attacked them? The introduction of troops of a foreign state into the territory of another state without its permission is aggression. The seizure of parliament by persons wearing unmarked uniforms is arbitrary. The adoption of any decisions by the Crimean parliament in such circumstances is a farce. First, the parliament was seized, the prime minister was replaced by a pro-Russian one, and then this new prime minister asked Russia for help, when the assistants were already here, already a day ago, they were controlling the peninsula. Like two peas in a pod, it looks like the Anschluss of 1938, and even a referendum-plebiscite a month later under friendly bayonets. There - April 10, here - March 30.

Has the Russian government calculated all the risks of this incredible adventure? I’m sure not. As well as Adolf Aloizovich did not calculate in his time. I would have counted - I would not rush about the bunker in April 1945 under Russian bombs, I would not eat an ampoule of poison.

What if the West does not act like Chamberlain and Deladier in 1938, but introduces a complete embargo on the purchases of Russian energy resources and freezes Russian holdings in its banks? The Russian economy, already moribund, will collapse in three months. And trouble will begin here, in comparison with which the Maidan will seem like a paradise garden.

And what if the Crimean Tatars, who are categorically against the Russian government, who remember what this government did to them in 1944 and how they did not let them back until 1988, if the Crimean Tatars turn to the co-religionist and consanguineous Turkey for the protection of their interests? After all, Turkey is not over three seas, but on the other side of the same Black Sea. And it owned Crimea longer than Russia - it owned it for four centuries. The Turks are not a chamberlain and not a deed: in July 1974, defending their fellow tribesmen, they occupied 40% of the territory of Cyprus and, ignoring all the protests, they still support the so-called Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which no one recognizes except them. Maybe someone wants to have the Turkish Republic of South Crimea? But if the hot heads of the Crimean Tatars rise up to fight, then Muslim radicals from all over the world will gladly join them, and especially from the North Caucasus and the Volga region. Will we not bring a storm from the ruined Crimean resorts to our Russian home? What are we - our own terrorist attacks are not enough?

And finally, having acquired the Crimea, torn apart by internal strife, we will forever lose the people of Ukraine - the Ukrainians will never forgive the Russians for this betrayal. What do you think will not happen, that this is too much, will grind - there will be flour? Do not hope, dear Russian chauvinists. At the end of the 19th century, Serbs and Croats considered themselves to be one people, only separated by borders, confession and alphabet graphics. They strove for unity - how many books were written about it then, smart, kind books. And now there are few peoples who are so angry with each other as the Serbs and Croats. How much blood was shed between them, and all for some pieces of land, some towns and valleys, in which they could live together richly and joyfully. They could, but they could not. Greed for brotherly land made brothers enemies. And in everyday life, doesn't it happen? Is it worth losing a brotherly people forever because of ghostly desires? And a split in the Russian Church was already inevitable then. Its Ukrainian half will split off from Moscow's forever.

But the Kremlin's success in the annexation of Crimea will turn out to be an even more terrible defeat. If everything turns out easily, then tomorrow the regions of Kazakhstan inhabited by Russians will be requested to Russia, there, you see, South Ossetia with Abkhazia, and North Kyrgyzstan. Austria was followed by the Sudetenland, the Sudetenland - Memel, Memel - Poland, Poland - France, France - Russia. It all started small ...

Friends! We need to come to our senses and stop. Our politicians are dragging our people into a terrible, terrifying adventure. Historical experience says that nothing will go wrong. We should not be led, as the Germans were led in due time to the promises of Goebbels and Hitler. For the sake of peace in our country, for the sake of its real revival, for the sake of peace and true friendliness in the territories of historical Russia, now divided into many states, let's say no to this insane and, most importantly, completely unnecessary aggression.

We lost so many lives in the twentieth century that our only true principle should be the principle proclaimed by the great Solzhenitsyn: the preservation of the people. Preserving the people, not collecting land. Lands are collected only with blood and tears.

We don't need blood or tears anymore!

"Hitler is the angel of Russian history." No, these words, blasphemous for everyone in our country, do not belong to the odious Goebbels, but they were uttered just the other day. And it was not some fan of Bandera who had taken a sip of vodka, and not a scumbag with a swastika shaved on the back of his head, but a completely fine-looking gentleman with a sleek professor beard, living in Moscow, Andrei Zubov (on the picture).

By occupation, Zubov is indeed a professor, a doctor of sciences and not just any, but historical ones. And today he is no longer just a historian, but a political activist who is listed as the third in the electoral list of the liberal party PARNAS. And the professor said this ode to Hitler not in his kitchen, but in an interview with the American Radio Liberty. Franking with a reporter about the details of his biography, Zubov admitted that in his youth he was a zealous anti-Soviet. “I,” he said, “back in the“ Coffee Maker ”of our institute, told my friends how annoying it was that Stalin did not lose the war to Hitler. Because all the same, in the end, the allies would have liberated us, but then the British and Americans would have established democracy in our country and replaced the cannibalistic Stalinist regime. "

Considering that even this was not enough, Zubov, answering the questions, then "gave a couple of things", adding: "In comparison with Stalin, Hitler is an angel of Russian history."

The liberal historian explained this monstrous comparison by the fact that Stalin exterminated more people than Hitler. However, this does not change anything. To call the possessed Fuhrer an "angel" in any context is blasphemy and cynical mockery of the memory of millions of his victims.

However, such a statement was made by Zubov, of course, not by accident. The professor had already mentioned Hitler before, back in 2014, during the annexation of Crimea to Russia.

In an article published in the Vedomosti newspaper, he compared this fateful event for Russia with ... the Hitlerite Anschluss of Austria. “In Germany,” wrote Professor Zubov, “99.08% voted for unification with Austria, in Austria itself, which became the Ostmark of the German Empire, 99.75%. On October 1, 1938, the Czech Sudetenland were also reunited with the consanguineous Germany, on March 22, 1939 - the Lithuanian region of Klaipeda, which in one day turned into the German Memel. In all these lands, most of the Germans really lived, everywhere many of them really wanted to unite with the Hitlerite Reich. Everywhere this reunion took place with fanfare and shouts of jubilation of the crowd, distraught in the chauvinistic frenzy and with the connivance of the West ... And everything seemed so radiant. And the glory of Hitler shone at its zenith. And the world was in awe of Great Germany. The accession of regions and countries to the Reich without a single shot, without a single drop of blood - isn't the Fuhrer a genius politician? And six years later Germany was defeated, millions of her sons were killed, millions of her daughters were dishonored, her cities were wiped off the face of the earth, her cultural values, accumulated for centuries, turned to dust. 2/5 of the territory was torn away from Germany, and the rest was divided into zones and occupied by the victorious powers. And shame, shame, shame covered the heads of the Germans. And it all began so radiantly! ... History will repeat itself, ”Zubov concludes with false pathos.

The professor's hints from history are clear.

He compares Russia's actions in the case of the return of Crimea to the capture of European states by the Nazis, threatening her with defeat and death, recalling the defeat of Germany.

But wouldn't he, as a doctor of historical sciences, not know that we are talking about completely different events, which under no circumstances lend themselves to comparison? That Crimea revolted only after a coup d'etat was carried out in Kiev, and a pro-fascist junta came to power in Ukraine? What on the peninsula, if its inhabitants had not made their historical choice, would have been arranged the same bloody massacre, which the Kiev punishers then staged in the Donbass?

Of course, Zubov knows all this very well, he can't help but know, as a man who taught at MGIMO for many years and, of course, has become quite adept in politics. But why then does he turn everything upside down?

The answer is simple. This is the usual method of liberals - if there are no weighty arguments against the current government, which they are calling to overthrow, then they must be thought up.

Compare, for example, the actions of the Russian leadership with Hitler, and portray the expression of the will of the people of Crimea as "Russia's aggression."

And Zubov has been doing it for a long time and methodically. For example, he said at one time on "Echo of Moscow" about Nadezhda Savchenko: “Nadezhda Savchenko is a person who clearly did not want to be a hero - she was an ordinary hero of Ukraine, one of thousands of people who stood up to defend their country from Russian aggression then, in the spring and summer of 2014. But God awarded her a special fate - she was captured and accused, as everyone knows, of having had some part in the deaths of Russian journalists ... But in any case, it is quite clear - among the thousands of victims and incredible iniquities that have been committed in eastern and southeastern Ukraine over the past two years, even if the Savchenko case has something underneath it, it drowns in this sea of crimes, which, naturally, were committed by both sides, but the aggressor, of course, was Russia, not Ukraine. .. "

But Zubov and his associates are trying in vain. In response to his words of praise about Hitler, a whole storm of indignation broke out on the network.

Here are just some of the comments:

User Dmitry Ermakov wrote: “Nothing new. Read The Brothers Karamazov. Smerdyakov: "In the twelfth year, there was a great invasion of Russia by the Emperor Napoleon the first of France ... and it would be good if these very French conquered us then: an intelligent nation would subdue a very stupid one and annex it. There would even be other orders, sir."

Alexei Safronov: “It is not for nothing that Zubov is a member of an anti-people party with foreign funding. This can only be said by a traitor to his own people, who must be prosecuted for promoting the genocide of our people, desecrating the memory of the dead, and for openly calling for betrayal of the Motherland. It was not Stalin who fought the war, but the people who were sentenced to extermination by the very sponsors who financed Hitler and today are financing PARNAS ”.

Elena Ivanova: “Pluralism, in this case, is inappropriate and, it seems, is prosecuted. And how many years did this unfinished Vlasovite teach? "

Answering Elena's question, let's say that Zubov taught for a long time. And not just anywhere, but in one of the most privileged educational institutions in Moscow - at MGIMO. From where he was finally expelled recently.

As can be assumed, due to the too original interpretation by the former professor of modern history of Russia. Here he, as you can see, and hit in politics, deciding to break into the State Duma under the wing of PARNAS. What for? And, probably, in order, as his friends, the liberals, urge, "to return Crimea to Ukraine."

Considering that even this was not enough, Zubov, answering the questions, then "gave a couple of things", adding: "In comparison with Stalin, Hitler is an angel of Russian history."

However, such a statement was made by Zubov, of course, not by accident. The professor had already mentioned Hitler before, back in 2014, during the annexation of Crimea to Russia.

In an article published in the Vedomosti newspaper, he compared this fateful event for Russia with ... the Hitlerite Anschluss of Austria. “In Germany,” wrote Professor Zubov, “99.08% voted for unification with Austria, in Austria itself, which became the Ostmark of the German Empire, 99.75%. On October 1, 1938, the Czech Sudetenland were also reunited with the consanguineous Germany, on March 22, 1939 - the Lithuanian region of Klaipeda, which in one day turned into the German Memel. In all these lands, most of the Germans really lived, everywhere many of them really wanted to unite with the Hitlerite Reich. Everywhere this reunion took place with fanfare and shouts of jubilation of the crowd, distraught in a chauvinistic frenzy and with the connivance of the West ... And everything seemed so radiant. And the glory of Hitler shone at its zenith. And the world was in awe of Great Germany. The accession of regions and countries to the Reich without a single shot, without a single drop of blood - isn't the Fuhrer a genius politician? And six years later Germany was defeated, millions of her sons were killed, millions of her daughters were dishonored, her cities were wiped off the face of the earth, her cultural values, accumulated for centuries, turned to dust. 2/5 of the territory was torn away from Germany, and the rest was divided into zones and occupied by the victorious powers. And shame, shame, shame covered the heads of the Germans. And it all started so radiantly! ... History will repeat itself, ”Zubov concludes with false pathos.

The professor's hints from history are clear.

He compares Russia's actions in the case of the return of Crimea to the capture of European states by the Nazis, threatening her with defeat and death, recalling the defeat of Germany.

The answer is simple. This is the usual trick of the liberals - if there are no weighty arguments against the current government, which they are calling to overthrow, then they must be thought up.

Compare, for example, the actions of the Russian leadership with Hitler, and portray the expression of the will of the people of Crimea as "Russia's aggression."

And Zubov has been doing it for a long time and methodically. For example, he said at one time on "Echo of Moscow" about Nadezhda Savchenko: “Nadezhda Savchenko is a person who clearly did not want to be a hero - she was an ordinary hero of Ukraine, one of thousands of people who stood up to defend their country from Russian aggression then, in the spring and summer of 2014. But God awarded her a special fate - she was captured and accused, as everyone knows, of having had some part in the deaths of Russian journalists ... But in any case, it is quite clear - among the thousands of victims and incredible lawless and southeastern Ukraine over the past two years, even if the Savchenko case has something under it, it drowns in this sea of crimes, which, naturally, were committed by both sides, but the aggressor, of course, was Russia, not Ukraine ... "

But Zubov and his associates are trying in vain. In response to his words of praise about Hitler, a whole storm of indignation broke out on the network.

Here are just some of the comments:

User Dmitry Ermakov wrote: “Nothing new. Read The Brothers Karamazov. Smerdyakov: “In the twelfth year, there was a great invasion of Russia by the Emperor Napoleon the first of France ... and it’s good if these very French conquered us then: an intelligent nation would have conquered a very stupid one and annexed it. There would even be completely different orders, sir "

Elena Ivanova: “Pluralism, in this case, is inappropriate and seems to be prosecuted. And how many years did this unfinished Vlasovite teach? "

As can be assumed, due to the too original interpretation by the former professor of modern history of Russia. Here, apparently, he got into politics, deciding to break into the State Duma under the wing of PARNAS. What for? And, probably, in order, as his friends, the liberals, urge, "to return Crimea to Ukraine."

"Hitler is the angel of Russian history." No, these words, blasphemous for everyone in our country, do not belong to the odious Goebbels, but they were uttered just the other day. And it was not a fan of Bandera who sipped on vodka, and not a scumbag with a swastika shaved on the back of his head, but a quite fine-looking gentleman with a sleek professorial beard, Andrei Zubov living in the city of Moscow (in the photo, and in the top picture next to him - Mikhail Kasyanov).

Considering that even this was not enough, Zubov, answering the questions, then "gave a couple of things", adding: "In comparison with Stalin, Hitler is an angel of Russian history."

The liberal historian explained this monstrous comparison by the fact that Stalin exterminated more people than Hitler. However, this does not change anything. To call the possessed Fuhrer an "angel" in any context is blasphemy and cynical mockery of the memory of millions of his victims.

However, such a statement was made by Zubov, of course, not by accident. The professor had already mentioned Hitler before, back in 2014, during the annexation of Crimea to Russia.

In an article published in the Vedomosti newspaper, he compared this fateful event for Russia with ... the Hitlerite Anschluss of Austria. “In Germany,” wrote Professor Zubov, “99.08% voted for unification with Austria, in Austria itself, which became the Ostmark of the German Empire, 99.75%. On October 1, 1938, the Czech Sudetenland were also reunited with the consanguineous Germany, on March 22, 1939 - the Lithuanian region of Klaipeda, which in one day turned into the German Memel. In all these lands, most of the Germans really lived, everywhere many of them really wanted to unite with the Hitlerite Reich. Everywhere this reunion took place with fanfare and shouts of jubilation of the crowd, distraught in chauvinistic frenzy and with the connivance of the West ... And everything seemed so radiant. And the glory of Hitler shone at its zenith. And the world was in awe of Great Germany. The accession of regions and countries to the Reich without a single shot, without a single drop of blood - isn't the Fuhrer a genius politician? And six years later Germany was defeated, millions of her sons were killed, millions of her daughters were dishonored, her cities were wiped off the face of the earth, her cultural values, accumulated for centuries, turned to dust. 2/5 of the territory was torn away from Germany, and the rest was divided into zones and occupied by the victorious powers. And shame, shame, shame covered the heads of the Germans. And it all started so radiantly! ... History will repeat itself, ”Zubov concludes with false pathos.

The professor's hints from history are clear.

He compares Russia's actions in the case of the return of Crimea to the capture of European states by the Nazis, threatening her with defeat and death, recalling the defeat of Germany.

Of course, Zubov knows all this very well, he can't help but know, as a man who taught at MGIMO for many years and, of course, has become quite adept in politics. But why then does he turn everything upside down?

The answer is simple. This is the usual method of liberals - if there are no weighty arguments against the current government, which they are calling to overthrow, then they must be thought up.

Compare, for example, the actions of the Russian leadership with Hitler, and portray the expression of the will of the people of Crimea as "Russia's aggression."

And Zubov has been doing it for a long time and methodically. Here is what, for example, he said at one time on Echo of Moscow about Nadezhda Savchenko: “Nadezhda Savchenko is a person who clearly did not want to be a hero - she was an ordinary hero of Ukraine, one of thousands of people who stood up to defend their country from Russian aggression then, in the spring and summer of 2014. But God awarded her a special fate - she was captured and accused, as everyone knows, of having had some part in the deaths of Russian journalists ... But in any case, it is quite clear - among the thousands of victims and incredible lawless and southeastern Ukraine over the past two years, even if the Savchenko case has something under it, it drowns in this sea of crimes, which were committed, naturally, by both sides, but the aggressor, of course, was Russia, not Ukraine ... "

But Zubov and his associates are trying in vain. In response to his words of praise about Hitler, a whole storm of indignation broke out on the network.

Here are just some of the comments:

User Dmitry Ermakov wrote: “Nothing new. Read The Brothers Karamazov. Smerdyakov: “In the twelfth year, there was a great invasion of Russia by the Emperor Napoleon the first of France ... and it’s good if these very French conquered us then: an intelligent nation would have conquered a very stupid one and annexed it. There would even be completely different orders, sir "..."

Elena Ivanova: “Pluralism, in this case, is inappropriate and, it seems, is prosecuted. And how many years did this unfinished Vlasovite teach? "

Answering Elena's question, let's say that Zubov taught for a long time. And not just anywhere, but in one of the most privileged educational institutions in Moscow - at MGIMO. From where he was finally expelled recently.

[Question from the "Russian Salon": why not expelled earlier, because you heard how he did dirty tricks?]

As can be assumed, they were expelled because of the too original interpretation by the former professor of modern history of Russia. Here he, as you can see, and hit in politics, deciding to break into the State Duma under the wing of PARNAS. What for? And, probably, in order, as his friends, the liberals, urge, "to return Crimea to Ukraine." || Andrey Sokolov